top of page

Ball, Blake Scott

Charlie Brown’s America: The Popular Politics of Peanuts

Oxford (New York)

2021



OUR SYNOPSIS: Blake Scott Ball argues that through his Peanuts comic strip, Charles M. Schulz vacillated between the “left and right within the bounds of the broad middle of American political culture during the Cold War era.” (1) He shows that Schulz “regularly addressed controversial issues” while maintaining his ideological vagueness, building and maintaining broad popularity. (2) Ball draws on archived fan letters sent to Schulz to build understanding of population reactions to Peanuts, placing these in conversation with oral histories, articles, and more. He argues that through the character of Charlie Brown, Schulz “made an appeal to rationality in the face of paralyzing fear in the atomic age.” (36) The youth of the characters “was the key to all of Schulz’s social criticism: using his adorable child characters to disarm readers as he addressed sensitive topics.” (64) By the late 1950s, Christian religion became a key Peanuts theme as well. When Schulz racially integrated Peanuts in the late 1960s, the apparent “color-blindness” that Charlie Brown employed towards Black characters reflected a popular white approach at the time. During the Vietnam War, Schulz utilized Snoopy’s flying ace role to comment on the controversial conflict. He also at times combined social issues, for example often addressing environmental and consumerism simultaneously.

BIG QUESTIONS:

  • How did Charles M. Schulz address controversial topics in Peanuts without alienating audiences?

  • To what extent did Peanuts evolve over the course of its publication run and why did it evolve the way that it did?

FEATURE QUOTES:

  • Peanuts became the fastest growing US comic strip in the 1950s because cartoonist Charles Schulz was unafraid of addressing the feats and concerns of the Cold War era.” (27)

  • “With Linus’s security blanket, the Cold War moved from an exterior confrontation of military maneuvering and strategy to an interior, personal conflict of containing one’s own mental and emotional ‘weaknesses’ for the good of a stable and prosperous democratic society.” (32)

PRIMARY SOURCES:

BALTIMORE CONNECTIONS:

  • N/A

bottom of page