top of page

Snyder, Sarah B.

From Selma to Moscow: How Human Rights Activists Transformed U.S. Foreign Policy

Columbia (New York)

2018



OUR SYNOPSIS: Sarah B. Snyder “identifies transnational connections and social movements during the ‘long 1960s’ as the foundation for human rights activism,” delving into cases of the United States responding to human rights questions abroad through assertive foreign policy. She utilizes five main case studies: “[H]ow Americans responded to human rights violations in the Soviet Union, in Southern Rhodesia after the 1965 unilateral declaration of independence, in Greece after the 1967 coup, in authoritarian South Korea, and in Chile after the 1973 coup.” (1) She also shows that U.S. domestic and foreign policies became increasingly interconnected in this period, for instance with domestic social issues driving human rights efforts abroad. She emphasizes that human rights policy support built cumulatively over time. The most extensive and numerous American foreign policy responses to human rights abuses came in the Soviet Union. NGOs, members of Congress, and private citizens came together in networks of activism that spurred international action. In Rhodesia, African American activists directly related the freedom struggle of African peoples to their own civil rights work in the United States. She shows that in the 1960s and early 1970s overall, Americans increasingly made clear an unwillingness to tolerate U.S. government support for regimes that violated human rights.

BIG QUESTIONS:

  • How did the inherently elite circles of U.S. foreign policymaking interact with more the more grassroots character of domestic civil rights activism in the realm of human rights?

  • To what extent were NGOs uniquely positioned to be effective in this global human rights work?

  • How did the Cold War context impact human rights foreign policymaking in the Soviet Union?

FEATURE QUOTES:

  • “The motivations, targets, and rhetoric of human rights activism during the long 1960s marked significant breaks with activists from the late 1940s and 1950s. Amid the various 1960s-era domestic social movements, Americans were also making transnational connections that drove their interest in international causes.” (168)

PRIMARY SOURCES:

BALTIMORE CONNECTIONS:

  • N/A

bottom of page